Drawing for HYDRACTIN

USPTO serial 79027533

HYDRACTIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYDRACTIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Beauty and body care productsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 25, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 26, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 7, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 5, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 28, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 5, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 5, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 5, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 18, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 20, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance