USPTO serial 79027544
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
I-47842 SAN GIOVANNI IN MARIGNAGNO (RN), IT
I-47842 SAN GIOVANNI IN MARIGNAGNO (RN), IT
SAN GIOVANNI IN MARIGNAGNO (RN), IT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith R. Obert
Keith R. Obert Ware, Fressola, Maguire & Barber LLP755 Main Street, Bldg. 5MONROE, CT 06468UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Hydraulic arms for distributing concrete, hydraulic arms for truck concrete mixers, hydraulic arms for concrete pumps, transported by lorry; fixed arms, namely power operated concrete placing booms | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 7, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |