Drawing for POM-BÄR

USPTO serial 79027547

POM-BÄR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POM-BÄR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Roasted, dried, salted or spiced nuts; processed potato products as snacks, potato products as snacks manufactured in an extrusion and pelleting process or other processesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
030Maize, rice and cereal products as snacks, manufactured in an extrusion and pelleting process or other processes, processed cereal products as snacks; savoury and salted biscuits; muesli bars essentially consisting of processed grains, nuts, dried fruits and chocolate; saucesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 2, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 3, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 4, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 2, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 28, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 2, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 2, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 18, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 4, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance