Drawing for QUEEN BEE

USPTO serial 79027564

QUEEN BEE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUEEN BEE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009BLANK INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CARDS, MICROPROCESSOR CARDS, SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; SEMICONDUCTORS, MICROPROCESSORS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODSSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 11, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 10, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 16, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 6, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 4, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 4, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 30, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2008CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jun 26, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 13, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 24, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 21, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 13, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 25, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 21, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2006RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Nov 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance