Drawing for CAM-WAVE

USPTO serial 79027592

CAM-WAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3405641Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 1, 2008
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAM-WAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald J. Kubovcik

Ronald J. Kubovcik Kubovcik & Kubovcik1215 South Clark StSte 1105Arlington, VA 22202-4396

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric batteries; chargers with an electric discharge function for video camera batteries; chargers for batteries of other types; meters for measuring the charge level of electric batteries; meters for measuring the residual capacity of electric batteries; specially shaped storage containers for video camera batteries; power supply adapters for chargers; cinematographic machines; electric meters; receivers and transmitters for use in the broadcast and video industry, namely, receivers of electronic audio signals, receivers of electronic video signals, transmitters of electronic audio signals, and transmitters of electronic video signalsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 24, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 28, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 3, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 21, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2008CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Feb 15, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 4, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 4, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 4, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 31, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 1, 2007LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 13, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 13, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance