Drawing for Serial No. 79027605

USPTO serial 79027605

Serial No. 79027605

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3280195Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 14, 2007
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79027605?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul A. McLean, Esq.

Paul A. McLean, Esq. DLA Piper LLP (US)2000 University AvenueEast Palo Alto, CA 94303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for enterprise document and records management and enterprise content management namely, capturing, storing, retrieval and modification of information in electronic form; computer software for electronic management of business information, including emails, voice and video data, digital images and documents; computer software for use in implementing electronic information sharing; computer software for training in the field of document and records management; computer software for document and record management for enterprises, including governmental and financial institutionsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Computer programming; computer programming and software development in relation to enterprise document and records management and enterprise content management; advice and consultancy in relation to computer software development and computer networks; installation, maintenance, updating and repair of computer software and databases; computer software technical support services; computer services in relation to the design of web pages for others; licensing of computer softwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 10, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 12, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 29, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 21, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 21, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 30, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 28, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 29, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 21, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 18, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance