Drawing for DIAMANDES

USPTO serial 79027624

DIAMANDES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3268607Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 24, 2007
Examiner
OTT, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with DIAMANDES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Scott Keller

R. Scott Keller Warner Norcross & Judd LLP111 Lyon St NW900 Fifth Third CenterGrand Rapids, MI 49503

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines * from Argentina *ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 14, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 18, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 23, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 18, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 25, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 4, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Apr 4, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 4, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 4, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 19, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2012LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2012COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Oct 9, 2012PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Aug 28, 2012LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 13, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2008LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Feb 28, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 26, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 26, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 14, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 8, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 13, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance