Drawing for OCTAPOOL

USPTO serial 79027655

OCTAPOOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OCTAPOOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Toys, games and playthings, octagon shaped snooker and pool tables; polygon shaped snooker and pool tables; games played on octagon and polygon shaped snooker and pool tables; table cushions being part of snooker and pool tables; apparatus for playing the games of snooker and pool; balls, cues, cue tips, cue extensions, rests, spiders and chalk for snooker cues; sporting articles for use in playing the games of snooker and pool, sporting articles for use in practising the games of snooker and poolSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 23, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 18, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 23, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 20, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 6, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 3, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance