USPTO serial 79027670
GOLD CASTELLBLANCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3298301Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2007
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLD CASTELLBLANCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KARIN SEGALL
KARIN SEGALL DARBY & DARBY P.C.P.O. BOX 5257NEW YORK, NY 10150-5257UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Sparkling wines and sparkling cava wines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 14, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |