USPTO serial 79027688
CHARLES LAFITTE E.O SUCCESSEUR DE LA MAISON GEORGE GOULET FONDEE EN 1834"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3261320Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2007
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHARLES LAFITTE E.O SUCCESSEUR DE LA MAISON GEORGE GOULET FONDEE EN 1834"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Denise I. Mroz
DENISE I MROZ WOODCOCK WASHBURN LLPCIRA CENTRE 12TH FL2929 ARCH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19104-2891Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, wines, sparkling wines, wines with the protected appellation of origin Champagne | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHAMPAGNE CHARLES LAFITTE,; successeur de Georges Goulet,; Maison fondée en 1834
- Other trademarks owned by CHAMPAGNE CHARLES LAFITTE, successeur de Georges Goulet, Maison fondée en 1834
- Other trademarks owned by CHAMPAGNE CHARLES LAFITTE,; successeur de Georges Goulet,; Maison fondée en 1834
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named CHARLES LAFITTE E.O SUCCESSEUR DE LA MAISON GEORGE GOULET FONDEE EN 1834"
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 6, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |