Drawing for WOLVERINE

USPTO serial 79027700

WOLVERINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3436182Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 27, 2008
Examiner
LEE, DEBRA ANN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WOLVERINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew S. Ehard

Andrew S. Ehard Merchant & Gould P.C.P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines, namely, web processing equipment used in connection with continuous webs of paper, textiles, packaging materials; conveyor dryers for the food, chemical, pharmaceutical and tobacco processing industries; belt conveyors; industrial drying machinery, namely, machinery for drying fabrics, foods, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, natural fibers, synthetic fibers, tobacco, wood, veneer, textiles, leather, hay, charcoal briquettes, scouring pads, ceramics, vegetables and rubber; industrial heat treating and curing machinery, namely, machinery for heat treating and curing textiles, rubber, hosiery, and synthetic products; garnett machines.SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Propane gas, natural gas or butane gas roasting machines; roasters for coffee beans, nuts, and seeds; heat recovery apparatus, namely, finned heat exchangers for recovering and processing waste heat from process exhaust air streams; industrial baking ovens for the food industry; industrial incinerators; industrial gaseous fluid dryers and ovens; liquefied gas type ovens for food or beverage processing; food and beverage processing machines and apparatus, namely, grills, melters, toasters, puffers, namely, industrial cooking ovens for puffing food products, coolersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 26, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 26, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 26, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 10, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 3, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 14, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 11, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 21, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 11, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 6, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 5, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 28, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 24, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 14, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 30, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 16, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 1, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 20, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 20, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance