Drawing for INGELVAC MYCOFLEX

USPTO serial 79027710

INGELVAC MYCOFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3359945Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 25, 2007
Examiner
OKEKE, BENJAMIN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with INGELVAC MYCOFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donna F. Schmitt

Donna F. Schmitt Armstrong Teasdale LLP7700 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 1800St. Louis, MO 63105United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Vaccines for swineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2026ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Aug 27, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 21, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 25, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 14, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 9, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 25, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 2, 2014NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Feb 1, 201415AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Feb 1, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 22, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 24, 201315AFREGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED—
Dec 24, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Dec 24, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2013E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
May 14, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 2, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 9, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 4, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 31, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 30, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2007RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED—
May 25, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 24, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 12, 2007ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 21, 2007CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Feb 8, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 27, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 27, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 16, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 15, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance