USPTO serial 79027750
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Sacoff
Robert W. Sacoff PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD & GERALDS200 S. WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 2900CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations of a medicinal nature, namely, fibrin sealant, a product derived from the blood, for use as an adjunct to hemostasis surgeries. | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |