Drawing for SURSIL

USPTO serial 79027750

SURSIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3340220Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 20, 2007
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SURSIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Sacoff

Robert W. Sacoff PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD & GERALDS200 S. WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 2900CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations of a medicinal nature, namely, fibrin sealant, a product derived from the blood, for use as an adjunct to hemostasis surgeries.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Oct 19, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 30, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jul 28, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 7, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jul 7, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Mar 27, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 27, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 25, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Nov 14, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 27, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jul 12, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 13, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 24, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 28, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 28, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 20, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 1, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 8, 2007UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Feb 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 7, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 8, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 20, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 20, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Nov 17, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 5, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance