USPTO serial 79027767
BALLBAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BALLBAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Handbag frames; purse frames; industrial packaging containers of leather; clothing for domestic pets; bags and the like; pouches and the like; vanity cases (not fitted); umbrellas and their parts; walking sticks; canes; metal parts of canes and walking sticks; handles of canes and walking sticks; saddlery; leather (unworked or semi-worked); leather straps; raw hides; raw skins; tanned leather; fur; dog collars; traveling bags; pouches of leather for packaging; wallets; purses; parasols; whips; harness for animals; sausage casings; bags made of leather or imitation of leather; bags made of textiles; bags made of non-wovens | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing; non-Japanese style outerclothing; coats; sweaters and the like; shirts and the like; nightwear; underwear (underclothing); swimwear (bathing suits); swimming caps (bathing caps); Japanese traditional clothing; aprons (clothing); collar protectors (for wear); socks and stockings; puttees and gaiters; fur stoles; shawls; scarves (scarfs); Japanese style socks (tabi); Japanese style socks (tabi covers); gloves and mittens (clothing); babies' diapers of textile; neckties; neckerchieves; bandanas (neckerchiefs); warmth-keeping supports; mufflers; ear muffs (clothing); hoods; sedge hats (suge-gasa); nightcaps; caps (clothing); headgear for clothing; garters; sock suspenders; suspenders (braces); waistbands; belts for clothing; footwear; shoes and boots; shoe dowels; shoe pegs; tongue or pullstrap for shoes and boots; hobnails; protective metal members for shoes and boots; Japanese style wooden clogs (geta); Japanese style sandals (zori); masquerade costumes; clothes for sports; boots for sports; horse-riding boots; clothing for horse-riding; layettes (clothing); cyclists' clothing; waterproof clothing; theatrical costume; football shoes; ties; sashes for wear | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |