USPTO serial 79027768
FONTSOMME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3335445Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 13, 2007
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FONTSOMME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
COGNAC, FR
COGNAC, FR
COGNAC, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUE10TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Distilled spirits with a cognac base; distilled spirits made from alcohol; distilled spirits with a wine base | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 14, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |