Drawing for BITRON

USPTO serial 79027881

BITRON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3598572Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 31, 2009
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BITRON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1397 Carroll DriveATLANTA, GA 30318UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Parts of washing machines and dishwashers, namely, electromechanical and hybrid timers, ] solenoid valves, [ push-button switches, pressure switches, ] motorized valves for alternating washing, detergents and rinse-aid dispensers, [ water-distributor systems, ] control units for household appliances, [ pre-heating control units, timer control units; and parts for electric kitchen machines, namely, ] microswitches [ and gear motors]ACTIVE—
011[ Apparatus for lighting, heating, steam generating, cooking, refrigerating, drying, ventilating, water supply and sanitary purposes, namely, ] water valvesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 7, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 7, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 18, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 18, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 13, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 1, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 6, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
May 6, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 6, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 31, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 31, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 30, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 13, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 7, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 4, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 10, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 8, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance