Drawing for MOGYI

USPTO serial 79027891

MOGYI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOGYI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Industrial sunflower oils, industrial oilsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
029Prepared peanuts, desiccated coconut, prepared walnuts, dates, preserved fruits, fruit peel, fruit chips, candied goods (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13;2;b) of the Regulations); prepared almonds, raisinsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
030Peanut confectionerySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
031Grains, peanuts (fruits), citrus fruits, walnuts, coconuts, almonds, hazelnuts, squashesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035AdvertisingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 25, 2010DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 5, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 19, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 17, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 20, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance