Drawing for BLUE ELEPHANT

USPTO serial 79027896

BLUE ELEPHANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUE ELEPHANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Animal-based foodstuffs; vegetables and other horticultural products prepared for consumption and preservation not included in other classesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
030Plant-based foodstuffs prepared for consumption and preservation not included in other classesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 16, 2019FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 1, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 12, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 23, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 19, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 4, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 4, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 21, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 6, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 6, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 31, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 31, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 20, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 20, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 5, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance