Drawing for SINO WHEEL

USPTO serial 79027913

SINO WHEEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLLIER, DAVID E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SINO WHEEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Alloys of common metal; aluminium; ingots of common metal; steel alloys; white metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
012Automobile bodies; automobile tires; automobiles; vehicle wheel rims; vehicle wheel spokes; vehicle wheels; hubs for vehicle wheels; bands for wheel hubs; vehicle wheel tires; spoke clips for wheelsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jan 13, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 12, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 12, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 15, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 13, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2007ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 15, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 15, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 8, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 17, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 10, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2006RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Dec 2, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance