Drawing for DYNAMIK BEA GAS FUELLED SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 79027985

DYNAMIK BEA GAS FUELLED SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3318628Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2007
Examiner
ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DYNAMIK BEA GAS FUELLED SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert E. Purcell

Robert E. Purcell Hiscock & Barclay, LLPOne Park Place300 South State StreetSyracuse, NY 13202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Mechanical, pneumatic, combustion gas-operated and electric tools, namely, combustion gas-operated nailing machines and power staplersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
008Hand tools, and hand-operated implements, namely, hand-operated and hand-powered guns for driving in staples, nails and pins; stapling, nailing and screwing apparatus, namely, hand-powered staple, nailing and screwing gunsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 2, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 10, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 15, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 15, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 19, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 30, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 8, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 7, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 4, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 4, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 4, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 30, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 31, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance