USPTO serial 79027990
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Chamonix, FR
CHAMONIX, FR
CHAMONIX, FR
AMMERSCHWIRH, FR
CHAMONIX, FR
AMMERSCHWIRH, FR
AMMERSCHWIRH, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith Toms, Esq.
Keith Toms, Esq. McCarter & English, LLP265 Franklin StreetBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | [SURF BOARDS OR WINDSURFING BOARDS; SNOWSHOES;] SKIS[; PROTECTIVE PADDINGS FOR SKIING, SNOWBOARDING, SURFING, SKATEBOARDING, CYCLING, AND WATER SPORTS, INCLUDING FOR WATER SPORTS IN THE NATURE OF WAKE SURFING, WAKE BOARDING, KITE SURFING AND WATER SKIING] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 22, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 29, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 18, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 14, 2014 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 3, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |