USPTO serial 79027995
ESADOV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3366031Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 8, 2008
- Examiner
- ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ESADOV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Medicines and pharmaceutical preparations for human use, namely contraceptives; contraceptive pharmaceutical preparations contained in and released from a contraceptive sub-dermal implant | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Sub-dermal implant, namely non-degradable implant in the nature of contraceptives to be inserted under the skin | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MERCK SHARP & DOHME B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by MSD Oss B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by N.V. Organon
- Other trademarks owned by N.V. Organon
- Other trademarks owned by N.V. Organon
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named ESADOV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 9, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 15, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |