USPTO serial 79028026
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
DOUGLAS R. WOLF WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVE.BOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Aluminum poles for water flow with brass or plastic connectors; metal handles for wet mops; aluminum shafts for hand-operated cleaning apparatus; fastening clips for hand-operated wiping and cleaning apparatus, also for brushes and sponges; telescopic poles, in particular as handle extensions for hand-operated window, wall, ceiling and floor squeegees; articulated joints for telescopic poles, handles for telescopic poles, connection adapters for handle extensions; all aforementioned goods of metal or essentially of metal for hand-operated cleaning apparatus | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | Hand-operated tools, namely, floor and window scrapers; hand-operated implements for picking up paper, namely, trash grabber devices for picking up paper; hand-operated implements, namely, personal hand retrieval devices that allow an individual to grab or retrieve items out of normal reach | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Transport, work, cleaning, disinfection, paper and waste-disposal trolleys for cleaning buildings and windows, hospitals, hotels and the like | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Fastening clips for hand-operated wiping and cleaning apparatus, also for brushes and sponges; telescopic poles, in particular, as handle extensions for hand-operated window, wall, ceiling and floor squeegees; articulated joints for telescopic poles, handles for telescopic poles, connection adapters for handle extensions; all aforementioned goods not of metal nor essentially of metal for hand-operated cleaning apparatus | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Small hand-operated household and kitchen utensils and apparatus not of precious metal or coated therewith, namely, dust pans, feather and furniture dusters; household and kitchen containers not of precious metal or coated therewith, in particular, buckets and waste sacks; empty spray bottles and empty spray cans of plastic and/or metal for detergents; hand-operated apparatus and containers of plastic and not of precious metal or coated therewith for cleaning buildings and windows, namely, containers for household or kitchen use not of precious metal; window dusters; window cleaners in the nature of a combination squeegee and scrubber, combinations of a squeegee and mop, a combination of a squeegee and scraper, and holders for window, wall, ceiling and floor cleaner covers; integrated dispensers for moistening manually-operated floor cleaning apparatus; brooms; scrubbing brushes; hand scrubbing brushes; dish washing brushes; floor brushes; shoe brushes; toilet brushes; tub brushes; ceiling brushes; wall brushes; window brushes; toilet sets consisting of brushes and brush stands; mops as hand-operated cleaning utensils for ships included in this class, dusters, hand-operated radiator cleaning apparatus, namely, cleaning cloth, dusters, dusting brushes, feather dusters, brushes for cleaning radiators, hand-operated mops with handles for radiators and heating devices; chamois leather wiping cloths for cleaning purposes; cleaning cloths; hand-operated wiping and cleaning apparatus for windows, walls, ceilings and floors, in particular, window squeegees, holders for window wipers, for water squeegees, for ceiling and for wall brushes, hand-operated wax applicators and removers; replacement blades as parts of window, wall, ceiling and floor squeegees; squeegee parts, namely, rubber wiper blades for cleaning; window, ceiling, wall and floor squeegees; cleaning and polishing covers, namely, mops for window, floor, ceiling and wall cleaning and polishing apparatus; microfiber cleaning cloth, microfiber polishing cloths; mops; cleaning sponges, in particular, floor, wall, ceiling and window cleaning sponges, sponge cloths for cleaning; fitted cases with straps for holding hand-operated implements and utensils for cleaning, in particular, for cleaning windows; holders for covers for cleaning devices; handles for cleaning devices and brushes, in particular, for window cleaning, specifically, telescopic extensions; steel blades for cleaning smooth surfaces; holders, in particular, of corrosion-resistant plastic for steel blades for cleaning glass and surfaces | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 5, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |