USPTO serial 79028053
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
S.D.R. Biotec; Verfahrenstechnik GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by S.D.R. Biotec; Verfahrenstechnik GmbH
S.D.R. Biotec; Verfahrenstechnik GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by S.D.R. Biotec; Verfahrenstechnik GmbH
S.D.R. Biotec; Verfahrenstechnik GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by S.D.R. Biotec; Verfahrenstechnik GmbH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralph E. Locher
Ralph E. Locher Lerner Greenberg Stemer LLPP.O. Box 2480Hollywood, FL 33022-2480UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Insulating felt for use in building insulation and for use in the construction industry; and electrical insulating tape | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Asphalt felt for building purposes; non-metallic building materials, namely glass fabrics for industrial use, glass non-wovens textiles made of synthetic fibers for use in the building industry, glass inlays for stabilizing inclines, chopped glasses for absorbtion, stabilization and reinforcement of soil, and glass mats for geotextiles for purposes of drainage, recultivation, plant support, filtration; geotextiles, namely fabric and sheeting for nurseries, greenhouses and landscaping; geotextiles for the purposes of drainage, stabilizing inclines, recultivation, plant support, absorbtion, filtration, separation, stabilization and reinforcement of soil | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Felt; gauze fabric; non-woven textile fabrics; fabrics for textile use, namely fabrics used in the manufacture of glass non-wovens, glass inlays, glass mats, glass fabric weaves, and glass yarns; and wall hangings of textile. | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |