Drawing for LIFEBABY

USPTO serial 79028056

LIFEBABY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, MARK A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIFEBABY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Children's garmentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 18, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 17, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 7, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 21, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 13, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 5, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 21, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance