Drawing for ORIGINAL GARMZ CLOTHING CO.

USPTO serial 79028073

ORIGINAL GARMZ CLOTHING CO.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3409302Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 8, 2008
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORIGINAL GARMZ CLOTHING CO.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, t-shirts, long-sleeve t-shirts, polo shirts, vests, tank tops, sweaters, jumpers, hooded tops, track suit bottoms, shirts, jackets, pants, jeans, trousers, waist coats, dresses, skirts, blouses, frocks, boots, shoes, sports shoes, slippers, sandals; footwear, headgear, namely, baseball caps, clothing caps, hats, beanies, skull caps, berets, headbandsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 10, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 10, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 11, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 24, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 26, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 26, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 8, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 28, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 13, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 20, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 19, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 28, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 1, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 14, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 14, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 25, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 5, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 19, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance