Drawing for IFD

USPTO serial 79028165

IFD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3499214Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 9, 2008
Examiner
FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IFD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Drying machines that use pressure or centrifugal force for drying goods for the food industry the dairy industry, the pharmaceutical industry or the chemical industry, namely, spray dryers, fluid bed dryers and fluid bed agglomerator dryersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Dryers that use heat for drying goods for the food industry, the dairy industry, the pharmaceutical industry or the chemical industry, namely, flash dryers, microwave dryers; Coolers for the food industry, the dairy industry, the pharmaceutical industry or the chemical industry, namely, spray coolers, fluid bed coolers; Industrial filter machines for all the aforementioned apparatuses, namely, bag filters or metal filters for use in industrial drying equipment, industrial cooling process equipment, agglomeration equipment or coating equipment; all the aforementioned goods for the food industry, the dairy industry, the pharmaceutical industry or the chemical industrySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 16, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 16, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 19, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 18, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 10, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 10, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 9, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 24, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 15, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 15, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 15, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 15, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 14, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 14, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 14, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 4, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 17, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 13, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 25, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance