Drawing for REMALOY

USPTO serial 79028253

REMALOY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3508777Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 30, 2008
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with REMALOY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anne E. Naffziger

Anne E. Naffziger Leydig Voit & Mayer, Ltd.Two Prudential Plaza, 180 N. StetsonSuite 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Metal components, namely, wires [ and casting alloys, ] for dental purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 5, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 5, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 25, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 25, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 20, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 20, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 20, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 3, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 25, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 16, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 13, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 13, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 8, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 5, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2007DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 11, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 7, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance