USPTO serial 79028282
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Material for repairing teeth and for dental crowns and bridges, material for odontological and dental implant systems; porcelain, titanium, metal alloys, ceramic materials, precious metal materials for dental purposes and other material, including biocompatible material, for dental restorations and filling teeth; dental wax | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Surgical, medical and odontological implants; orthopaedic articles, dental crowns and bridges; instruments and apparatus for reconstruction and rehabilitation within the odontological, medical, orthopaedic and surgical fields; surgical, medical, and odontological instruments and apparatus; artificial joints, teeth, eyes, limbs and other prosthesis; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 20, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 27, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |