Drawing for NOBELREPLACE

USPTO serial 79028282

NOBELREPLACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NOBELREPLACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Material for repairing teeth and for dental crowns and bridges, material for odontological and dental implant systems; porcelain, titanium, metal alloys, ceramic materials, precious metal materials for dental purposes and other material, including biocompatible material, for dental restorations and filling teeth; dental waxACTIVE
010Surgical, medical and odontological implants; orthopaedic articles, dental crowns and bridges; instruments and apparatus for reconstruction and rehabilitation within the odontological, medical, orthopaedic and surgical fields; surgical, medical, and odontological instruments and apparatus; artificial joints, teeth, eyes, limbs and other prosthesis; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goodsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 20, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 30, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 10, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Feb 6, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 19, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 6, 2008IRFIIRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB
May 27, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 3, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 13, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 13, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 29, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 25, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 24, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 24, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 24, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 13, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 12, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance