USPTO serial 79028296
STX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3352613Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 11, 2007
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
71642 Ludwigsburg, DE
71642 Ludwigsburg, DE
71642 Ludwigsburg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus
Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Memory programmable controls, namely, store-programmable controls which control motion of a production machine, motion controllers for movement control in a packing machine, drive amplifiers with control functions for programmable motor control and control apparatus with integrated software-based controls for control panels in a harvester; computer programs and software used to monitor, control and automate factory manufacturing processes, for automating visualization systems, motion controllers and movement controls, robot controls, control apparatuses, and SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) systems for use with memory programmable controls recorded on CDs, DVDs and memory programmable discs; controls and control modulus for controlling synchronous motors or asynchronous motors, especially brush-less drives, servo-motors, stepping motors, direct drives; controls for position control and speed control of these motors; computer peripheral devices | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design of computer hardware and software for memory-programmable controls for others; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer programs and software for memory programmable controls used to automate memory-programmable controls, motion controllers and movement controls, robot controls, control apparatuses, visualization systems, and SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) systems; design and development of computer hardware and software, in particular for memory-programmable controls | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |