Drawing for SPACE ALLIANCE

USPTO serial 79028304

SPACE ALLIANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPACE ALLIANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karin Segall and Robert S. Weisbein

Karin Segall and Robert S. Weisbein Foely & Lardner LLP90 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software and programs for mobile phones and communication devices; computer game software and programs enabling users to play games with mobile phones and communication devices; computer software and programs enabling users of mobile phones and communication devices to simultaneously access databases and global computer networks; computer software and programs enabling transfer of data between mobile communication apparatus; virtual reality game software; data cards containing computer game software; mobile phones and mobile phones with additional features such as short messaging, Internet access, MP3 player and radio; portable listening devices, namely MP3 players and radios; hand held units for playing video gamesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
028Electronic games, namely arcade-type electronic games, tabletop units for playing electronic games other than in conjunction with a television or computer, floor-standing units for playing electronic games other than in conjunction with a television or computer; hand held unit for playing electronic gamesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 26, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 16, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 16, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 16, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 15, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 30, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 6, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 6, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 27, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 3, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 8, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance