Drawing for T TECHNAI TEAM

USPTO serial 79028317

T TECHNAI TEAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3307534Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 9, 2007
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with T TECHNAI TEAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN ALUMIT

JOHN ALUMIT ALUMIT IP135 South Jackson Street, Suite 200Glendale, CA 91205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Motors for machine tools, namely torque ring motors, integrated motor drives and motor groups composed of electric motors and servomotors for machines for use in industrial automation; servomotors; rotor-stator motors, namely framless servomotors and electric motors for machines; parts for machine tools, namely milling heads, spindles, tilting rotary tablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 22, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 19, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 9, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 24, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 24, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 16, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Sep 16, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 23, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 16, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 15, 2007PBIRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST—
Jun 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 16, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 6, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 3, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance