USPTO serial 79028341
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
Burton S. Ehrlich Ladas & Parry LLP224 South Michigan AvenueSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60604| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations for laundry use; other preparations, namely, fabric softeners, starch, soaps, for laundry use; all purpose cleaning preparations; polishing preparations; scouring powders and liquids, abrasive powders and liquids; soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifrice; detergents other than for use in manufacturing operations and for medical purposes, namely, detergent soaps, dish washing detergents, detergents for use in clothes washing machines, all the aforementioned products are lipid based and/or liposome based products | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations, namely, medicinal herbs and plants in the form of extracts or in dried or preserved form, taken from flowers, vegetables, ever greens, spices, coral, seaweed, grain, corn, seed, roots, leaves, stalks, boles, skin, bark, peel, rind, husk extraction products, either in desiccated, micronized or lyophlised powder form or in liquid colloid/water solutions; dietetic foods for medical use, namely, oligoelements, enzymes, vitamins, oligomeric silicate enriched cakes, bread or pastries, soups, dressings, sauces, meals with a liposome based photo induction process; appetite depressant containing photo induced liposome based slow-metabolizing sugars and plant extracts; medicines for the treatment of metabolic, hormonal, inflammatory, infectious, neoplasic, immune, degenerative disorders or diseases, made with natural ingredients, entrapped in a photo induced liposome based colloidal drink made with natural ingredients; sanitary preparations for medical purposes; dietetic substances, namely, foods, desserts, and sugar, adapted for medical use, food for babies; medical plasters, materials for dressings, namely, bandages and gauze; material for stopping teeth, dental wax; disinfectants for sanitary purposes, and for medical instruments; preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides, herbicides; medical preparations for cleansing the skin, sanitary sterilizing preparations for cleansing medical equipment for medical purposes; all the aforementioned products are lipid based and/or liposome based products | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour; preparations made from cereals, namely, breakfast cereals, processed cereals, processed cereal-based food to be used as an ingredient in for making other foods; bread, pastry; confectionery, namely, chocolate, pastries, candy, and frozen desserts; ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt, mustard, vinegar, condiment sauces; spices; ice; all the aforementioned products are lipid based and /or liposome based products | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |