Drawing for BRIO

USPTO serial 79028342

BRIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3324874Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 30, 2007
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with BRIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Grace Han Stanton

GRACE HAN STANTON PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010prostheses for [ hands, legs, arms and ] feet; orthoses for [ hands, legs, arms and ] feet, [ trunk and neck; ] artificial limbs; artificial knees, feet and ankles; artificial skin covering used to cover prosthetic devices; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 1, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 26, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 23, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 23, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 17, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 17, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 4, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 4, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 24, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 24, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 5, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 5, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 14, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 7, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 6, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 5, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance