Drawing for RETIGO

USPTO serial 79028373

RETIGO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3654809Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 14, 2009
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with RETIGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam D. Mandell

Adam D. Mandell Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon Blvd., Ste 1400Arlington, VA 22201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for the beverage industry, namely, tea boilers, coffee boilers, hot water boilers, milk heaters, soup heaters; machines for the food industry, namely, steam ovens, regenerators for re-heating of chilled meals and for cooking of meals in cabinets for food, blast chillers, convection ovens, steam combination ovens, cooking combi ovens, gas cooking combi ovensACTIVE—
009Electric and electronic control and performance monitoring units for machines for the beverage industry, for machines for the food industry, for electromechanical beverage preparation machines, for electromechanical kitchen apparatus, for apparatus for heating, steam generating, cooking and refrigerating, for electric coffee machines, for electric tea machines, for shock freezers and for steam ovensACTIVE—
011Apparatus for heating purposes, namely, electric heating fans, heating furnaces, hot-air space heating apparatus, hot-water space heating apparatus; apparatus for steam generating purposes, namely, steam generators, steam valves; apparatus for cooking purposes, namely, cook tops, cooking ranges, commercial cooking ovens; electric coffee machines; electric tea machines; electric steam cooking ovens; electric cooking combi ovens; convection ovens; electric hot air cooking ovens; electric bakery ovens; electric cooking ovens; electric stovesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 1, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 24, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 6, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 6, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 10, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 12, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 14, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 20, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 27, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 5, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 23, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 23, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 10, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 20, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 7, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 7, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 2007CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Nov 24, 2007LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 14, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 14, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 13, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 16, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 16, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 10, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance