USPTO serial 79028382
LINEABLU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3462437Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 8, 2008
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LINEABLU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Slattery
James M. Slattery Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLPP.O. Box 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Colorants, namely, stains for interior use, lacquers; water-based and solvent-based paints and varnishes; coloured, matt, gloss and pigmented paints and varnishes; wood preservatives; paints for treatment and decoration of wooden products; paints for exterior and interior use; paints and preservatives for use on metal; paints for the decoration of metal; flatting agents for paints and varnishes, namely, glossy topcoat finishes; preservatives for wood; coatings in the nature of finishes for stainless steel, sheet, strip, and plate, which provides decorative appearance; preservatives against rust for metal; dyes for wood; mordants for use in stains for interior use; thinners for lacquers and paints; impregnating sealers for general industrial use; paints primers; oils for treatment and preservation of wood; raw natural resins for use in the manufacture of resins and for general industrial use; protective preparations, namely, paints for marble and brickwork | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 003 | Detergents for cleaning surfaces before painting | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 004 | Natural wax, namely, wax effect stain | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARCH COATINGS ITALIA S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by ARCH SAYERLACK COATINGS S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by ARCH SAYERLACK COATINGS S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by SHERWIN-WILLIAMS ITALY S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by ARCH COATINGS ITALIA S.r.l.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named LINEABLU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |