Drawing for E.N.E.S. ELITE NATUREL

USPTO serial 79028397

E.N.E.S. ELITE NATUREL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3405648Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 1, 2008
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E.N.E.S. ELITE NATUREL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ÖMER SOYLU

NECATIBEY CAD. ELGÜNSK. NO: 4/6ANKARA,

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030[ Flour, processed semolina and food starch ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
032[ Mineral water, spring water, table water, soda water, tonic water, ] vegetable and fruit juice; vegetable and fruit juice concentrate; essences for use in making non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit juice and vegetable juice; [ concentrates and powders used in the preparation of soft drinks, fruit juice and vegetable juice; unfermented grape juice, turnip juice, tomato juice ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 26, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 8, 2015INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 7, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 7, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 7, 201471.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
May 6, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 28, 201471AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Mar 28, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 17, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 3, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 1, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 20, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 4, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 16, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance