USPTO serial 79028437
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery and cosmetics | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | Butts, unworked or semi-worked leather, imitation leather, suitcases, attaché cases, handbags, beach bags, travelling bags, rucksacks, shopping bags, garment bags for travel, parasols and umbrellas | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, footwear and headgear | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |