Drawing for HH FONDATION DE LA HAUTE HORLOGERIE

USPTO serial 79028458

HH FONDATION DE LA HAUTE HORLOGERIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3505419Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 23, 2008
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HH FONDATION DE LA HAUTE HORLOGERIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

Lawrence E. Apolzon Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business information services, namely, providing business information in the field of watch making and watch design; distribution of advertising material; [ organization of exhibitions, trade fairs and conventions for commercial and advertising purposes, namely, arranging, planning, and conducting trade fairs; ] the dissemination [ and updating ] of advertising material for others; publishing of advertising texts; public relations; and conducting opinion pollingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041[ Organization of competitions in the field of watch making and watch design; arranging and holding exhibitions in the field of watch making, watch history, and watch design; ] educational services, namely, arranging conferences [ and conventions ] for [ cultural and ] educational purposes in the field of watch making, watch history and watch design; publication of books; [ party planning; ] and the publication of texts, other than advertising and publicity textsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 21, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 23, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 26, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 26, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 11, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 22, 2016INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 11, 2016INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 24, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 24, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Mar 24, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 24, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 18, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 23, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 18, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 5, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 5, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 5, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 24, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 23, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 4, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 22, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 20, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance