USPTO serial 79028463
COSMETICSDESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3520729Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 21, 2008
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with COSMETICSDESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-34000 Montpellier, FR
FR
F-34000 Montpellier, FR
William Reed Business Media SAS
Montpellier, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisabeth H. Coakley
Lisabeth H. Coakley Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.5445 Corporate Drive, Suite 200Troy, MI 48098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs and software for creating, publishing and managing online content in the form of messages, data, texts, images and videos and relating to the publication of information for professionals in the cosmetics and beauty products industry, downloadable from an external computer network or from the Internet; downloadable publications, namely, newsletters, news articles, and market reports in the field of cosmetics in electronic form supplied from a database or from the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising; business promotion and information services through the Internet, namely, promoting the business of others in the cosmetics business and providing business information services relating to the cosmetics business; compiling business advertisements for third parties, namely, displaying advertisements for others; rental of advertising space online for promoting goods and services between professionals | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, electronic messaging services via the Internet for technical, scientific and professional news and information about the cosmetics and beauty products industry; transmission of messages, data, texts and images by electronic means; communications by computer terminals; transmission of information held in a database or on the Internet via email | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Publishing services for news articles, newsletters, and market reports featuring scientific, industrial and technical information and news for professionals in the cosmetics industry involved in manufacturing technologies for cosmetics products | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of websites for others; compilation for others of web pages on the Internet, namely, providing links to web sites of others featuring the design and development of cosmetics; rental of a database server to third parties | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DECISION NEWS MEDIA SAS
- Other trademarks owned by William Reed SAS
- Other trademarks owned by DECISION NEWS MEDIA SAS
- Other trademarks owned by William Reed Business Media SAS
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COSMETICSDESIGN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 21, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 4, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |