Drawing for EXENTRO

USPTO serial 79028479

EXENTRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3268615Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 24, 2007
Examiner
KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXENTRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Clarke Holman and Harvey B. Jacobson, Simor L. Moskowitz, Allen S. Melser, Michael R. Slobasky, Marsha G. Gentner, Jonathan L. Scherer, George W. Lewis, William E. Player, and Nathaniel A. Humphries

RECHTSANWäLTE RAINER DORNHEIM CHRISTIAN GIERSCHNESTORSTRAßE 36 ABERLIN FED REP, 10709GERMAN DEMOCRATIC

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005pharmaceutical preparations and substances for the treatment of central and peripheral nervous system diseases, heart and circulatory diseases, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, urological diseases, gastrointestinal diseases, metabolic diseases, chronic peripheral arterial occlusive diseases, inflammatory diseases, antiallergic preparations, and analgesic preparationsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 2, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 12, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 18, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 28, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 28, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 29, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 13, 2010CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Oct 1, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 17, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 20, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 26, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 26, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 14, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 8, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 14, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 20, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 11, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 7, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance