USPTO serial 79028490
NANO SP!DER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3369573Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 15, 2008
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with NANO SP!DER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mr. Robert C. Faber
Mr. Robert C. Faber Ostrolenk Faber LLP845 Third Avenue8th FloorNew York, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for the textile industry, namely electrospinning machines and parts and attachments, machines for the production of nanofibers, and machines for the semiconductor industry, namely machines for use in the manufacture, fabrication and treatment of semiconductors, integrated circuits and wafers | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | [ Fabrics and textile fabrics composed of nanofibers, that are used in manufacturing of filters, medical products, clothing, army uniforms and equipment ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ELMARCO s.r.o.
- Other trademarks owned by ELMARCO s.r.o.
- Other trademarks owned by ELMARCO s.r.o.
- Other trademarks owned by ELMARCO s.r.o.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named NANO SP!DER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 14, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 17, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 28, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 10, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |