Drawing for SCHIRMER PROFILE PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 79028496

SCHIRMER PROFILE PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3359952Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 25, 2007
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCHIRMER PROFILE PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Manufacturing equipment in the nature of automatic machines for cutting, milling, drilling, and punching of aluminum, PVC, and vinyl profiles, the foregoing machines for use in industrial window and door production, the automotive industry, production of fences, and in production of profiles in generalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Remote controls for industrial work processes, namely, for computer controlled manufacturing equipment in the nature of automatic machines for cutting, milling, drilling, and punching of aluminum, PVC, and vinyl profiles, the foregoing machines for use in industrial window and door production, the automotive industry, production of fences, and in production of profiles in generalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 20, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 20, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 9, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 17, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Apr 1, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 1, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 25, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 9, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 27, 2007PBIRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST—
Aug 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 16, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 16, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 15, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 7, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 6, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance