Drawing for SUPARSKIM

USPTO serial 79028504

SUPARSKIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3344437Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 27, 2007
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SUPARSKIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Catherine Merz

Mary Catherine Merz Merz & Associates, P.C.408 MADISON STREET, SUITE AOAK PARK, IL 60302UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water treatment units for use in separation and removal of oil or industrial waste from industrial wastewater or industrially used aqueous fluidsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 8, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 15, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 15, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 15, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 28, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 20, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 20, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 6, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 24, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 24, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 1, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 5, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 5, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 3, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance