USPTO serial 79028515
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifrices; creams, lotions, exfoliation, make-up, nail varnish, shampoos, bath and shower gels, preparations for hair care | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Precious metals and their alloys and goods made of or coated with these materials not included in other classes; jewellery, precious stones; horological and chronometric instruments; related accessories included in this class | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Leather and imitation leather, goods made of these materials not included in other classes; animal skins, hides; trunks and suitcases; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; saddlery; handbags, bags, purses, key cases (leather goods), purses and wallets of all kinds in leather and imitation leather | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing; footwear; headgear, all the aforementioned goods made of leather, textiles and other materials; belts, braces | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Services in the fields of science and technology, as well as related research and design services; industrial analysis and research services; design and development of computers and software; legal services; exploitation of industrial property rights; franchising and granting of licenses in the field of retailing of fashion articles, in particular fashion wear, namely making available technical know-how and intellectual property rights; provision of access time to information via global computer networks (the Internet) | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2011 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 22, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |