Drawing for SALTPRINT

USPTO serial 79028549

SALTPRINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3324879Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 30, 2007
Examiner
SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SALTPRINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith R. Obert,

Keith R. Obert, WARE FRESSOLA , MAGUIRE & BARBER LLP755 Main Street, Bldg. 5MONROE, CT 06468United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products, namely, raw materials intended for use in the flavor industryACTIVE—
030Flavors of natural and artificial origin other than essential oils, and flavoring compositions, namely, flavoring additives for non-nutritional purposes, extracts used as flavoring intended to impart taste to foodstuffs, beverages and to all edible or chewing productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 13, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2023ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Dec 13, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 13, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 12, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 11, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Feb 11, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 10, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 27, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 27, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 5, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 5, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 14, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 4, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 27, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance