Drawing for SPV SOLUTIONS PRODUCTS VISIONS AG

USPTO serial 79028576

SPV SOLUTIONS PRODUCTS VISIONS AG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3508778Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 30, 2008
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPV SOLUTIONS PRODUCTS VISIONS AG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cecelia M. Perry

Cecelia M. Perry McGlew and Tuttle, P.C.ScarboroughScarborough, NY 10510-9227UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultancySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Arranging and conducting of workshops, seminars and colloquiums in the field of computing, especially programming, installation and use of software; teaching and providing training courses in the domain of business administration, especially the business activity in a company; teaching and providing training courses for the transformation of business activities into software systemsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Development of software for data processingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 11, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 5, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 5, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 1, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 1, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 25, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 2, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 31, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 4, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 24, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 6, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 3, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance