Drawing for AUREN

USPTO serial 79028609

AUREN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3352615Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 11, 2007
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with AUREN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*

Plus Government fees of $1,950

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vivian Ortiz-Ponce

Vivian Ortiz-Ponce PEREZ GUERRERO LLCP.O. BOX 9024163San Juan, PR 00902-4163United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035advertising and marketing; marketing consulting; marketing plan development; market research; business planning; business marketing consultation services; assistance with business management and planning; market plan development; market research; administrative accounting; account auditing; accounting; business auditing consultation; business consultations; business management consultations as well as development of processes for the analysis and the implementation of strategy plans and management projects; business appraisal consultation; human resources consultation; labor consultation; tax consultationACTIVE—
036Financial planning; financial consultation; financial risk management consultationACTIVE—
042Studies on the feasibility of projects and initiatives likely to undergo development relating to accreditation services, namely, evaluating organizations to determine whether the organization conforms to an established standard, engineering, conducting engineering surveys, urban planning, planning of buildings and infrastructure systems for buildings; information technology consultations in the nature of information technology appraisals, projects and studies; technical research in the field of information technology; computer consultations and computer consultation in the field of computer security all in the nature of computer and software design and development for others; legal consultationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2018PRANPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED—
Dec 12, 2018EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2018PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Jun 11, 201871AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Jun 11, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 11, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 6, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 6, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 11, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Dec 11, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 2, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 25, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 3, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 3, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 3, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 13, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 18, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2006RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Nov 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance