Drawing for PICSIGHT

USPTO serial 79028669

PICSIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3344442Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 27, 2007
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PICSIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George A. Coury

George A. Coury Bachman & LaPointe, P.C.900 Chapel StreetSuite 1201NEW HAVEN, CT 06510

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Optical and electronic apparatus and instruments used as peripheral equipment for data processing units, namely, film cameras, digital cameras and video cameras, including cameras for electronic or digital image detection and image processing; electronic components and modules for image processing used as peripheral equipment for data processing units, namely, smart and intelligent cameras or vision sensors; computer programs for measurement, quality control, 3D-imaging, texture analysis, movement detection and code recognition, recorded on data carriers for special use in the field of digital image detection and for image processingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 24, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 10, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 7, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 26, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Nov 26, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 15, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 28, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 28, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 30, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2006LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance