Drawing for SCIENCE

USPTO serial 79028724

SCIENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3335469Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 13, 2007
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCIENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David G. Boutell, Terryence F. Chapman, Mark L. Maki, Liane L. Churney, Brian R. Tumm, Steven R. Thiel, Donald J. Wallace, Dale H. Thiel and Sidney B. Williams, Jr.

David G. Boutell, Terryence F. Chapman, Mark L. Ma FLYNN, THIEL, BOUTELL & TANIS, P.C.2026 Rambling RoadKalamazoo, MI 49008-1631UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Office furniture, namely, desks, computer tables, filing cabinets, racks for storing office records or files; children's furniture, namely, desks, computer tables, filing cabinets, racks for storing school records and homework or filesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 9, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 6, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 15, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 13, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 28, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 21, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 3, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 21, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 19, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2006RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Dec 13, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2006RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Dec 9, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance